YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssss!

ummmmmmmmm??????????????????????

__________________

really good debate this one so why do you think no Kim and why yes Pink??

__________________

cos they are a waste of bloody space and money

lol good point and in this day and age why do we need them?? they belong in the medieval times, they are outdated and we should get rid of them

__________________

*claps lee*

nooooooo they are part of our heritage and set our country apart from others

Although the U.K. has perhaps the best-known monarchy in the world, it is far from unique. Within Europe, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium and Spain also function as constitutional monarchies, as do Japan and Thailand within Asia. As you see we have nothing special in our monarchy

__________________

it may not be the only one in the world but that doesn't mean that it isn't important!

The costs of monarchy are unjustifiable. Typically monarchs and their immediate family receive substantial amounts of money from the state to maintain luxurious lifestyles, complete with servants, expensive holidays and hobbies. The state also spends a great deal to maintain and run palaces and other royal residences, which are seldom accessible to the general public who support them through their taxes. Security costs are also very high

__________________