I don't believe that there is one creator. Try me again. Why should I believe what you say brown? I don't see any other proof other then faith, which is all religion is... faith in something that might or might not really be there.

I am sorry, but I am neither atheist nor a believer in pagan religions. i believe in God and i am a strong believer in that. This topic is more religious for me since it conflicts w/ my religion. Why believe wat Darwin says. Besides, he's only humans and humans are prone to make mistakes

whoa wtf
Are you from tenessee or something, cause you act like one of them.
Humans make mistakes, but the thing is, this is a theory: a test done over and over again to form a conclusion

But yea, I think it does conflict with a lot of people’s religions and I think that’s the reason why a lot of people don’t really accept it

And there’s nothing wrong with pagan religions/atheism!!!!
Some people believe in what they want to believe like how you believe in your religion.

Well, humans wrote the bible. And if they are prone to making mistakes how do you know that what the bible says is true? It's the same thing. Religion is all about faith and since there is no way to prove or disprove religion and faith, it is hard for me to accept it as a valid argument. But that's just my opinion. I don't mean to offend anyone, so I am sorry if I am. I have a lot of very good friends who are very religious and this topic has come up in our conversations on a number of different occasions. I just feel like it's hard to discuss topics like this when the counter argument is only that it conflicts with something that is purely based on faith.

um.... i thought it was obvious that the Bible was sacred because it came from God Himself. Besides, I'd rather trust a human that just wrote what God told him than a human that does chemical analysises that can go wrong by a simple thing and make up BS hypothesis based on random info.

How do you know God was speaking to them? I mean, really, how do you know? You have faith that he was speaking to them, and those are his words. When you look at it, if I said I had people speaking to me wouldn't you think I was nuts? Besides, all major theories have to be tested by more then one person. Theories haven't been proven, but there must be enough of something to keep them a theory, and not completely ruled out in the first place.

Also, how do you know that God and Science aren't working towards the same end? I mean, if he created everything and everyone then how do you know science is going against his word if he planned everything in the first place. My grandfather, and a number of others, believe that God is really a form of energy. Everything is made out of atoms, which, if I remember correctly, are energy. If that's the case then we are made to his likeness and he did create everything.

actually no, because there is always a difference between a fact and a theory
besides, how can you really test things? There is a theory of aliens that i have read from other people's posts. It's their theory, but did they test it out and do all this random shit to it?
NOOOOOOOOO
and besides, if God was speaking through the person, then the person would be able to do a myriad of miracles that none of us could even dream of. There must be proof you know

ok dude, ther's like hella people in the world that can perform these "miracles" that we can't dream of so are you saying that they're all messengers of god or something?
cause those people deny that and that will invalidate everything you just said

There is, when it comes right down to it that there is proof of alien life. Those are their thoughts about life in the universe. Now, I'm going to get nit picky here, but have you seen anyone perform a miracle before? If none of us can dream of them then how do you know it's possible? I believe that science has brought us medicine which to me proves that science brought us some good. It says to me that it has been proven. If all of the medical treatments out there didn't work we wouldn't be using them now would we? And if they work wouldn't that be proof enough to you? I do remember that when people were first learning about how the human body works, people had to take bodies to learn about them. Religious leaders said it was a crime to look in a person's body. I see that they have changed their tune since then.

If miracles are proof, and I've never seen one, and don't know anyone who has ever witnessed one first hand, wouldn't that disprove that as a solid argument or as a fact? Facts get established when two or more people repeat the same action and get the same outcome. Or when anyone can repeat the same action and get the same outcome.